<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Z6iii on Gidley&#39;s Gossipings</title>
    <link>https://gidley.co.uk/tags/z6iii/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Z6iii on Gidley&#39;s Gossipings</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 12:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gidley.co.uk/tags/z6iii/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Can a Nikon look like a Fuji? An AI says yes.</title>
      <link>https://gidley.co.uk/post/nikon-flexible-picture-control-fuji-look/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://gidley.co.uk/post/nikon-flexible-picture-control-fuji-look/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In my &lt;a href=&#34;https://gidley.co.uk/post/why-i-didnt-move-to-fujifilm/&#34;&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt; I wrote about borrowing a Fujifilm X-E5 to find out whether the grass was greener. My conclusion was that the film simulations are good but not better — just different — and that Nikon&amp;rsquo;s Flexible Picture Control on the Z5 II and Z6 III looked like it could produce richer results. I found a deal on a Z6 III, ordered it, and waited.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The camera arrived. First order of business: set up a custom Picture Control using Flexible Picture Control, aiming for the kind of rendering that made Fujifilm so appealing — vivid, slightly lifted greens, smooth shadows with a gentle glow, a look that feels alive without being garish. No post-processing, just the in-camera JPEG.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
