<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Philosophy on Gidley&#39;s Gossipings</title>
    <link>https://gidley.co.uk/tags/philosophy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Philosophy on Gidley&#39;s Gossipings</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gidley.co.uk/tags/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Magnificent Humanity, Misplaced Foundation</title>
      <link>https://gidley.co.uk/post/magnificent-humanity-misplaced-foundation/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://gidley.co.uk/post/magnificent-humanity-misplaced-foundation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Pope Leo XIV published &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html&#34;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Magnifica Humanitas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; on 15 May 2026 — the first papal encyclical centred on artificial intelligence. I am curious what Catholic social teaching would make of AI.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The encyclical&amp;rsquo;s account of why AI is dangerous — that we are building systems that will reshape human society without adequately thinking through what we owe each other — seems largely right to me. The place I find myself uncertain is the foundation: the doctrine that humans possess an inherent, infinite, ontological dignity that places us in a special category above any mind we might create. But when we&amp;rsquo;re all — religious and secular alike — trying to work out what we owe minds that don&amp;rsquo;t yet exist but look likely in a few years. I&amp;rsquo;m not sure &amp;lsquo;humanity is inherently special&amp;rsquo; holds up as an argument beyond faith.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
